Fur Seal Meets Penguin: The Hunter vs. The Hunted

Seasonally abundant populations of some organisms are important to the ecosystem in which they are seasonally abundant. If the populations are over-hunted or over-bred, the ecosystem will be put out of balance and begin to degrade. Such an example is the Adélie penguin and Chinstrap penguin. They are relatively common in Antarctic waters, but recent work shows the importance to ecosystems common species. If the species were to decline even a little, the function, services, and structure of the ecosystem could collapse. The authors of this paper observed several encounters between the penguins (usually juvenile fledglings) and Antarctic fur seals.

The authors knew that the seals have hunted penguins before because it was done in an efficient, effective manner, and it did not look as though it was the seals first time at hunting penguins. They observed that after the catch, the seals would shake the penguin, ripping chunks of flesh, skin, and feathers off, swallowing the chunks. The authors observed a seal eating a carcass, but could not ascertain whether or not the seal killed or scavenged it. The authors also observed various sea birds taking advantage of the seals expertise in acquiring a penguin, and one bird (a Giant Petrel) actually “stole” a penguin carcass from a fur seal. The bird and the seal both had a carcass and were observed to be eating the flesh or stomach contents of the bird. It is possible that these hunting events occur wherever the penguins and fur seals ranges overlap.

Figure 1. A subadult male fur seal grasping a fledgling Adelie penguin (Photo by INV)

The two types of penguins and the fur seals are all common species in the Antarctic, and they overlap quite profusely. It is unknown how or why the fur seals hunt the penguins. It is possible that they learned their technique from Giant Petrels or other species of seals, such as the Leopard Seal which is known to regularly hunt penguins. The authors think it is possible that the seals supplement their typical diet with penguins in an opportunistic manner. They also think that penguin predation is a more regular occurrence than previously recognized due to the high amount of penguin feathers in seal scat.

 When examining the scat of many different seals from several different islands, it was found that the seals diet was predominately penguin with some krill (due to the pink coloration). Species of penguin was undetermined. The high amount of predation is thought to be near the end of the season when fledgling chick’s numbers are high and adults are returning from hunting, thus having a full stomach. This may suggest that penguins are actually an important part of the seals diet, and not just an opportunistic meal. If the fledglings are targeted only in an opportunistic manner, long term effects will be minimal. However, if they are targeting adult penguins, the effect will hit both the adults and the chicks, decreasing populations sizes overall. This could affect penguin ecology in general. 

Although this entire paper was based off of a few observations of fur seals preying on penguins thus making it partially biased, it may also indicate an increase in fur seal predation on penguins that are seasonally abundant, and this could cause a long-term decline in penguin numbers if the seals and their preying ways continue to increase. This paper was designed in the hopes of encouraging other naturalists to document observations such as these. It would be of great value for scientists to conduct systematic observations at different locations to determine the scope of this predation in its entirety.

References 

Orca Research Trust - Scientific Articles

New Species of Lobsters Prompt Re-Analysis of Kiwaid Biogeographical History

Recently two new species of kiwaid squat lobsters were found on hydrothermal vents in the Pacific Ocean and in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. Finding these two new species had prompted the re-analysis of the kiwaid bio-geographical history. These squat lobsters are commonly known as "Yeti crabs." The yeti crabs get most of their nutrition from chemosynthetic episymbiotic bacteria growing on setae on their ventral surface and appendages. All but one species of kiwaid have been collected from hydrothermal vents. The other species, Kiwa puravida, was collected from cold seeps on the Pacific continental slope near Costa Rica. All the species were found in the Pacific or the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean; however one species, Kiwa tyleri, is found in mass amounts at vents on the East Scotia Ridge in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean.

Figure 1: Photos of known Yeti crabs.
 A) Kiwa puravida B) Kiwa sp. Galapagos Microplate C) Kiwa araonae D) Kiwa hirsuta E) Kiwa tyleri (F) Kiwa sp. SWIR
Scale bars are an approximation and represent 10 mm.

The first new species to be discovered was found on hydrothermal vents on the Galapagos Microplate and is called Kiwa sp. GM. The Galapagos Microplate is a distinct spreading system between the Galapagos Rift and the northern and southern portions of the East Pacific Rise. The second species is known as Kiwa araonae. This species is found on vents on the Australian-Antarctic Ridge in the southwest Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean. The discovery of this species widens the original known range of the Yeti crabs by ~6,500 km. This discovery suggests that the spread of the Yeti crabs is more complicated than previously believed. This discovery also suggests that the original seep-to-vent evolutionary progression may be wrong.

Figure 2: Map showing locations of kiwaids and the Cretaceous stem lineage fossil Pristinaspina gelasina in relation to land-masses and mid-ocean ridges.
Kiwaid are: i) Kiwa puravida, ii) Kiwa sp. GM, iii) Kiwa hirsuta, iv) Kiwa araonae, v) Kiwa tyleri, vi) Kiwa sp. SWIR.
Abbreviations are: NEPR = Northern East Pacific Rise; SEPR = Southern East Pacific Rise; GR = Galapagos Rift; GM = Galapagos Microplate; PAR = Pacific-Antarctic Ridge; AAR = Australian-Antarctic Ridge; CR = Chile Rise; ESR = East Scotia Ridge; AmAR = American-Antarctic Ridge; SWIR = Southwest Indian Ridge; CIR = Central Indian Ridge; SEIR = Southeast Indian Ridge; MAR = Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

The researchers found through many tests that Kiwaidae most likely originated in the Pacific. The researchers also found that the pattern of divergence could be closely linked to the evolution and movement of mid-ocean spreading ridges supporting hydrothermal vent habitats. Kiwaids, minus the one species mentioned earlier, are found only at hydrothermal vents along with BEAST analysis indicates that the common ancestor most likely inhabited the vents. They found that in other vent-associated taxa appeared consistent with movement and evolution of active spreading ridges. While there are puzzling reasons to why there are Yeti crabs are in certain areas there is also puzzling questions to why they are not in other areas.

Figure 3: The present-day configuration of mid-ocean ridges in the tropical East Pacific and the location of all currently known kiwaids

Yeti crabs are expected to be in areas such as vents along both the Galapagos Rift and the southern EPR, however they are absent from these. These vents have been majorly explored and no kiwaids have been found in them to this day. This study was done to include the two newest species and add on to a report previously done that included the previous four species. The research recently done does support the earlier inference to East Pacific origin. The research also shows that the divergence estimates are broadly similar to previous studies. 

Source for paper and figures 1-3:
Roterman CN, Lee WK, Liu X, Lin R, Li X, et al. (2018) "A New Yeti Crab Phylogeny: Vent Origins with Indications of Regional Extinction in the East Pacific." PLOS ONE 13(3):e0194696

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194696

Rising Carbon Levels Are Affecting Squid's Hunting Habits

Over the years the carbon level on Earth has raised by humans and the oceans absorb more than a quarter of excess carbon. The more carbon absorbed makes the water more acidic. Blake Spady from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University led an investigation to see how these increasing levels of carbon are effecting the behaviors of Cephalopods. Most studies prior to his were done with fish, however he chose Cephalopods because little was known on the affects of elevated carbon was on them. He researched the affects on two kinds of squid: the pygmy squid and the bigfin reef squid.

Figure 1: One of the two kinds of squid worked on the bigfin reef squid, Sepioteuthis Lessoniana 

They studied how the carbon levels were affecting how the behaved when catching their prey. They wanted to see how their hunting patterns were affected. They found that the same number of bigfin reef squid attacked their prey after being exposed to elevated carbon, however they were slowed down. They also found that the bigfin reef squid used different body patterns more often that the squid not exposed.

Figure 2: Pygmy squid, Idiosepius paradoxus

The pygmy squid was different from the bigfin reef squid. This time the researchers saw that the pygmy squid decreased in the amount they attacked. They found there was a 20% decrease in the proportion of pygmy squid that attacked their prey when exposed. They also saw that like the bigfin reef squid they were slower to attack their prey and changed body patterns more often. They also attacked their prey from farther away. Spady also found that both species showed increased activity when they were not hunting. He believes that they could be adversely altering their "energy budgets." Overall they found that the increased carbon had similar affects on the two squid species, suggesting that a variety of Cephalopods could be affected by the rising carbon levels in the oceans. This could cause massive problems in marine ecosystems. The next step in research is to determine how well these species and other marine species can adapt to the growing carbon in their environment. 

Source for article and figure 1: 

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-03/acoe-hss032018.php

Source for figure 2:

https://alchetron.com/Idiosepius

Behavior of a Solitary Wild Bottlenose Dolphin

The bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, is a widely popular marine mammal and the most common member of the family Delphinidae. The wild bottlenose dolphin can be found worldwide in tropical and temperate waters. They are commonly found in groups of 2 to 15 dolphins, although offshore herds are sometimes comprised of several hundred individuals. Bottlenose dolphins use echolocation to locate and capture prey, which consists of benthic invertebrates and fish for coastal individuals, and pelagic squid and fish for those offshore.

Figure 1. A small group of wild bottlenose dolphins

The presence of wild bottlenose dolphins in an area commonly generates strong public interest which can result in an increase in boat activity. This can potentially cause altered behavior and may pose a threat for the dolphins’ wellbeing. Several studies have been done on small groups of coastal bottlenose dolphins and have observed the dolphins spending more time underwater in order to avoid the boats. However, a study was done in 2005 that aimed to study the diving behavior of a solitary male bottlenose dolphin and determine if the presence of boats would cause any behavioral changes.

Figure 2. A group of bottlenose dolphins seen near a boat

            The study was done within a bay on the north-western coast of Spain. Daily observations were made to study the male dolphin’s diving behavior, including accurate measurements of the length of time spent in a dive. The results found that the solitary male bottlenose dolphin did not change his diving behavior as a result of boat presence. This may have been because the movement of the boats in the bay were slow and predictable, or because the dolphin was habituated to the stimulus of the boats. More studies are needed to figure out the exact effects boats have on dolphin behavior and this type of study is important in helping make more informed decisions on factors affecting the wellbeing of bottlenose dolphins.

References:

Díaz López, Bruno, et al. "Diving activity of a solitary wild free ranging bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus )." Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 88, no. 6, 2008, pp. 1153-1157. OhioLINK Electronic Journal Center, doi:10.1017/S0025315408000921.

NOAA. “Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).” NOAA Fisheries, 16 Jan. 2015, www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/dolphins/bottlenose-dolphin.html.

Dolphins tear up nets as fish numbers fall

As we all know, fisheries are an important food sources to us, especially those who live in the coastal areas. There are industrial fisheries that work on large spatial scales of marine ecosystems, as well as small scale industries, which are on more local spatial scales. Such animals that are fished be fisheries include: salmon, cod, tuna, mullets, squid, oysters, scallops, crabs, lobsters, shrimps, and many more marine species. Sometimes because of our fishing activities we have caused much environmental problems to the marine ecosystems including overfishing, and accidental bycatch which has cause population declines in target species as well as non-target species. Such population declines of various species can disrupt the marine food web and cause problems in trophic cascades. This can overall, decrease the biodiversity of such marine ecosystems. In this news article, scientists of the University of Exeter, have been studying how the fisheries of the Mediterranean Sea impact the bottlenose dolphins, as well as how the dolphins impact the fishing business.

Most of the Fishing business of the Mediterranean sea are small scale operations, which has cost them thousands of euros to fix the damage the dolphins caused on their fishing nets. They seemed to have learned to associate the nets with the fish they catch. So, lately they have been stealing the fishes from the nets as an easy food source, instead of actually hunting for the fish themselves, as said by lead author Robin Snape, of the Centre for Ecology and Conservation on the University of Exeter's Penryn Campus. Such problems have probably resulted in low fish stocks, which in turn have lead low catches due to the dolphins. However, even though the dolphins seem to be taking advantage of the nets and tearing them up, there is still the risk of such organisms being entangled and drowning. The authors have estimated that about ten dolphins in the Mediterranean die due to entanglement and drowning from the nets. Much of the funding for this study came from the Society for the Protection of Turtles.


Dolphins tear up nets as fish numbers fall

Extinction in Sharks

I found a research article regarding extinction in sharks, skates, rays, and chimaeras in different oceanic habitats.  Sharks, skates, rays, and chimaeras make up chondrichthyans.  They are compared amongst different habitats, which include: continental shelves, the deep sea, and the open ocean.  Overall, the chondrichthyans that dwell in the deep water have an overall higher rate of maturity and longevity.  Extinction risk was highly associated with phylogeny and reproduction.

Fig 1: Shark

The traits that are often associated with susceptibility to extinction are: low productivity, smaller litter sizes, slower growth rates, slower sexual maturity, and long "interbirth" intervals.  As stated earlier, the different habitats are: the continental shelf, the deep sea, and the open ocean.  The continental shelf is the zone of the ocean that goes from the shoreline to 200 meters deep, the open ocean goes deeper than the continental shelf, and the deep sea goes all the way to the largest depth of the sea.  

In comparison to fishes that live within the shallow-water, deep-water fishes have a slower growth rate, sexually mature later, live longer, and have smaller metabolic rates.  All of these factors cause them to have longer turnover times, which implies that the populations will be less productive.  Predation increases with an increase in metabolism and accelerated turnover rates.  Predation is moderate in both shallow habitats of continental shelves as well as the deep sea.  

The first step of this research paper is to figure out whether deep-water chondrichthyans have a longer turnover time than shallow-water chondrichthyans.  The second step of the paper is to show the consequence of the habitat and life-history traits on extinction.  

In order to complete the experiment, scientists chose 105 different species.  The took data on maximum body size, size at maturity, longevity, age at maturity, growth completion rate, litter size, the interbirith interval, reproduction mode, and habitat.  

Overall, the study concluded many vital aspects of the chondrichthyan habitat.  Firstly, the results from this study showed that the extinction of chondricththyans is indeed linked to habitat.  The chondrichthyans that occupy the deep water have enlarged turnover times.  Chondrichthyans that occupy the shallow and oceanic shelf have a lower extinction risk than those in the deep water.

It was also concluded that reproduction played a role in extinction.  It was found that non-matrophic females who reproduce at higher rates have less of a chance in becoming extinct.  The study also concludes that the body size of the fish has little to do with extinction rate.  If extinction were to occur in these fish, it would happen in fish that are extremely large or small.  The study concluded that the two most susceptible species of fish extinction were: Lamniformes and Squaliformes.  The article says that the solution of the problem is, "Minimizing fish mortality in deep-water habitats already exploited and preventing new deep-water ecosystems to be exploited are necessary to avoid the extinction of these species." (Garcia)

Source: Garcia, Veronica B., Lucifora, Luis O., Myers Ransom A. (2008). The importance of habitat and life history to extinction risk in sharks, skates, rays, and chimaeras. The Royal Society, 275(1630).  Retrieved from: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/275/1630/83#ref-49