photograph by Michael Patrick O'neill/Alamy
Many migratory species in the ocean face a constant battle with fisherman. However, satellite and fisheries data can
help prevent some of these battles. Some
of the animals that are most affected by bycatch include seabirds, turtles,
dolphins and cetaceans. Recently,
fisheries and satellites have been tracking leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in the Atlantic
Ocean and trying to prevent these unintended captures.
The
Atlantic Ocean is home to the last large populations of leatherback
turtles. Because these turtles have a
migratory nature and are considered to be the world’s largest turtle, they are
very vulnerable to unintended capture by fisherman. In the past, understanding how to protect
these turtles has been difficult because much of the bycatch is not reported by
fisherman and the turtles cover very wide paths in the Atlantic. The satellites have tracked leatherback
turtles from 1995 to 2010 to find out many of the zones that the turtles
regularly occupy, and to identify some areas where they may clash with
fisherman.
A
conservation scientist named Brendan Godley explained that the largest obstacle
to protecting the turtles has been knowing where, when, and in what fisheries
the bycatch is taking place. He has published research that pinpoints four sites in the north Atlantic and five sites in the south
Atlantic that are high-risk areas for leatherback turtles. These high-risk sites include
the economic zones shared by 12 different countries including the US and UK. In these economic zones, many of which overlap with high-risk turtle zones, longlines are cast regularly for tuna and other commercial fishing occurs here.
Action is
being taken to protect the populations of these leatherbacks in the Atlantic,
because the populations in the Pacific Ocean have nearly been wiped out and are
considered critically endangered by the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature. Another
scientist named Matthew Witt said that reversing the trend in the Pacific is
almost impossible, but with his research they are trying to prevent this from
happening in the Atlantic.
His team
was able to provide satellite data from over 100 turtles, showing their
standardized tracks and also including longline-fisheries data to identify
areas of low, medium and high interaction between turtles and humans. The team then made a map that covers the
Atlantic in a grid with squares that are 5 degrees latitude by 5 degrees
longitude.
Then,
Rebecca Lewison, a conservation ecologist, backed up Witt’s team research by
stating that his analysis makes it harder for governments to ignore the danger
that bycatch poses to migratory species, including the leatherback
turtles. She also pointed out that
ocean-wide scales like this one have to be taken into consideration if people
are serious about preventing the extinctions of pelagic species.
In
summary, these scientists are all working together to prevent the bycatch of
migratory species. If they know where
the turtles and other species are regularly found, fisherman can reduce bycatch
by making better decisions on where to fish. Maps like the one created in this study from satellite data can be used as a tool to prevent fisherman bycatch. Longlines and other coastal fishing gear such as trawls pose the
greatest risk to turtles, and future research can be done to incorporate these
dangers into the maps as well.
Good Post! I was aware of the dangers the turtles faced, but the efforts to counter these dangers. Hopefully, the data these scientists provide will benefit the fishermen and the conservation of these species. In a way, these guys are the face of the ocean!
ReplyDeleteI think it's so sad when helpless animals like turtles get caught up in fisherman's nets. Like Chris- I knew the dangers that Turtles have faced. I hope with all the statistics and preventative measures being taken, this will soon show a decline in negative affects on the Turtles!
ReplyDeleteIt's so great that we can use technology to track the turtle migrations so we can lessen our impact on them. Glad to know that this has been studied since 1995!
ReplyDelete