When we think of whales we typically think of these giant,
majestic creatures swimming through the oceans.
These animals play a major role ecologically while alive, but they also
play a significant role ecologically when they die. As their carcass reaches the ocean floor, it
provides many species with a unique habitat that allows them to flourish.
An example of a whale fall carcass (from Google images). |
Only 5 of the whales were studied using a remotely operated
vehicle (ROV) with a total of 27 dives made between the years 2003-2005. Certain bones were collected to identify the
species living on them. Epifaunal
species were collected using a suction sampler and infaunal organisms were
collected using a scoop sampler. The
paper presents three tables that identify the presence of different species of
mollusks, polychaetes and crustaceans on the whale carcasses.
A. pacifica. (from Google images) |
The most abundant species of mollusk found on the whale
carcasses was a bivalve known as Adipicola
pacifica. According to the
researchers, this species coated the exposed bone while another species of
mollusk, Adipicola crypta, preferred
the bone that was buried beneath the sediment.
The most abundant gastropod was Dillwynella
vitrea. Polychaetes found in small
pores of the whale bone were typically in the Nereididae,
Capitellidae and Dorvilleidae families.
Some cirripeds (crustaceans) known as Heteralepas were found on the nets that wrapped the carcasses but
not on neighboring rocks, indicating that they preferred the whale carcass.
The shell sizes of the two most abundant mollusks, A. pacifica and A. crypta, were compared.
The shell size of A. pacifica was
the largest on the 1.5 year old whale carcasses and gradually decreased through
the years. The shell size of A. crypta was the smallest on the 1.5
year old carcasses and gradually increased.
This should have been an indicator of a “reef stage” of the carcasses
according to the researchers, but it seems this was not really observed.
This study proved that a sperm whale carcass can sustain a
working ecosystem for more than three years.
Similar studies have been reported on baleen whales, which indicated
roughly the same amount of time as these sperm whales. The organisms found on the sperm whales were
similar to those found on the baleen whales at the family level, but not at the
species level.
Whales are my favorite animal, and while I prefer the live
ones, this study proves their importance even in their afterlife and further
strengthens my passion for this animal.
Source: http://proxy.ashland.edu:2315/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=ce5eb36f-7e78-4ec4-a481-4e989bb07ca4%40sessionmgr120&vid=4&hid=107
Entitled: "Three-year investigations into sperm whale-fall ecosystems in Japan"
This sounds like a very interesting study. Can you clarify one issue? What do you mean by the 1.5 year old carcass, and the decrease in size through the years? Where the whale carcasses deposited over multiple years? Or were the research dives done over multiple years? Why did one species get larger over the years and the other smaller.
ReplyDeleteCan you also provide a url link to the actual paper, and not the Ashland Library site? The library site will only work on campus or for people with AU accounts. Can you also provide a hyperlink to your source?
Are you referring to the size of the mollusk shells on the 1.5 year old whale carcass? These were compared to the 3.5 year old carcass I believe. Yes, the dives were made over multiple years. As for why the shells demonstrated this pattern, the paper does not mention why. The only thing I could think of would be if one species relied on a nutrient that was decreasing as the whale decomposed while the other species was thriving on an ever growing nutrient. I will be sure to look into this for my presentation. Also, try this URL for the paper: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00150.x/full
ReplyDelete