Sunday, January 28, 2018

Blue Sharks: Bioindicators of Pollution and Health in the Atlantic Ocean

Pollution is becoming an ever-prevalent problem for marine ecosystems. Many of these ecosystems are being affected by contaminants produced from human activities. Pollutants can cause harmful effects at lower levels of biological organization, such as the organism level or at the gene and cellular level. In this study, these effects were examined in blue sharks (Prionace glauca).

Blue Shark (P. glauca
Blue sharks are one of the more common species of shark consumed by humans. They are also apex predators, meaning they are at the top of the food web. These components make them a prevalent species to study as it allows for examination of bioaccumulation, as well as the effect it could potentially have on humans. This particular study aimed to measure if Atlantic blue sharks have high levels of POPs and metals in their tissues that could effect human health as well. The contaminant body burden levels correlated with biochemical responses of stress in the organism were measured as well.

Twenty blue sharks (12 female and 8 males) were captured at a depth of approximately 20 meters in the Atlantic Ocean, southwest of Portugal. All individuals caught were considered to be juvenile sharks. After capture, liver, muscle, and brain tissue were collected for analysis. After preparation of these tissues, statistical analysis was done to determine the amount of contamination present.

Marine apex predators, such as blue sharks, tend to accumulate pollutants and contaminants in their bodies at higher levels that the majority of other animals in their food chain. When examining the tissues from this sample of blue sharks it was found that the liver tissue contained higher levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) than the muscle tissue did. This was to be expected as POPs typically accumulate in tissues that have higher lipid content, such as the liver. POP analysis also revealed that non dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (NDL-PCBs) were the most abundant contaminant present in blue sharks. NDL-PCBs have been shown to produce toxic effects, and can affect fish behavioral responses. Some of the blue sharks sampled even had levels of NDL-PCBs present higher than what is legally allowed for human consumption. In addition to NDL-PCBs, brominated flame retardants (BFRs) were also found to be at high levels in these blue sharks captured from the Atlantic Ocean. BFRs have also been shown to have dangerous consequences to both marine organisms and humans, as they can impair organs such as the brain or thyroid.

Figure 1: Amounts of POPs found in liver and muscle tissue
Even more significant, as stated earlier, is the fact that all individuals were juveniles. Bioaccumulation has been proven to increase with size and age, so it is estimated that these already high levels of bioaccumulation of dangerous contaminants would have only continued to increase if the juveniles would have grown to full adult size.

Also examined in this study was the bioaccumulation of metals. In contrast to POPs, metals had higher levels of bioaccumulation in muscle tissue than liver tissue. These specimens showed higher levels of Mn, Cd, Fe, and Cu. However, in a previous study done approximately two decades ago that contained bigger organisms, showed lower levels of these contaminant burdens. This result raises red flags as it could indicate the possibility of a historical increase of contamination of these Atlantic Ocean waters. Mercury levels were also found to be above safe consumption levels. This is again troublesome as these blue sharks were juvenile and mercury levels are known to only increase as the size of the organism increases.

Because marine animals are constantly surrounded by xenobiotics, physiological alterations in response to stress could potentially be induced. When a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) plot was conducted of the liver tissue, it was discovered that nearly all contaminants had a positive association with DNA damage, which seems to indicate that when these blue sharks are exposed to POPs and metals, they are not able to counter the effects of the radical oxygen species (ROS) produced and prevent DNA damage.

Figure 2: CCA of liver tissue
It was concluded the lipid peroxidase (LPO), DNA damage, and inhibition of the enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were the main effects due to exposure to POPs and metals, which indicates they may be the best options to use for future biomonitoring. These contaminants can lead to ecological damage as well in terms of the blue sharks’ swimming, feeding, and reproduction habits. This conclusion can be seen and summarized in the figure below.

Figure 3: Blue sharks as bioindicators
This study also shows the prevalence of bioaccumulation and the potential human health risk it could have as blue sharks are a common species of sharks that are consumed by humans. In future studies, it would be beneficial to examine the individuals' stomach contents as well to see how feeding habits may influence bioaccumulation. It would also be important to examine larger sampling areas in the Atlantic Ocean as well as other oceans to see how contamination and pollution affect populations there as well.





Alves, L., Margarida, N., Marchand, P., Bizec, B., Mendes, S., Correia, J, Lemos, M., & Novais, S. (2016). Blue sharks (Prionace glauca) as bioindicators of pollution and health in the Atlantic Ocean: Contamination levels and biochemical stress response. Science of Total Environment, 563-564, 282-292.

3 comments:

  1. Most of the bioaccumulation that occurs is from mercury. Mercury gets into the sharks by absorbing into the water and making its way through the food chain. A lot of human activities increase the levels of mercury, mostly coal burning and gold minding.

    After reading your post I became curious about the health effects that humans may see from this issue. I looked into mercury an the fact that the absorbance from the food leads to mercury poisoning. Poisoning side effects can be; shaking, numbness or pain in the skin, blindness, memory problems, seizures, and even death.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This topic is quite concerning. The concept that mercury and other POP concentration levels increase with size and age is a significant enough factor to "start" to avoid this particular shark as a food source. It interests me where the leaching source originates from, at least the main source of these contaminants. I am sure all the trash and oil spills don't help.

    I am also interested in what the excrement of these sharks does to the microbial loop. I know that with lead poison in humans, the lead (and other heavy metals) eventually leave the body system, but very slowly. Some things that work with people are to eat an alkaline diet or to take supplements that bind to toxins and carry them out of the system. I wonder if there is some built-in system in blue sharks that does something similar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Tyler that this topic is quite concerning. These toxins are found in one of the most common species of shark that humans consume. What effects could this be having on humans? Could we reach a point where these sharks are no longer safe to eat?
    A study by Storelli & Marcotrigiano (2001) examined levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in the liver, muscle, and eggs of two Mediterranean shark species, Centrophorus granulosus and Squalus blainvillei. They chemical they found the highest concentrations of in the liver was DDT, a pesticide banned in the United States. A big question to ask is what kinds of effects are these toxins having on sharks? Is there a way to combat this problem, or could these toxin levels increase and possibly lead to deaths?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.